The global financial crisis, rooted so fundamentally in the private market model of housing provision, reminds us that neoliberal housing policies work primarily in the interest of the powerful capitalist property sector and not the public. In this essay, I address the political question of what anticapitalists should do about housing by returning to the stage of an often ferocious debate between Marxists, socialists and anarchists that dates back beyond Friedrich Engels’ famous 1872 polemic, The housing question (Engels, 1872). In what follows, I draw on the various insights as well as the commonalities and tensions present in these debates to devise a set of ‘ethical coordinates’ (Gibson-Graham, 2006) that might guide an anticapitalist housing politics. These coordinates are built out of recent theoretical discussions of Peter Linebaugh’s concept of ‘commoning’, and particularly the work of Massimo De Angelis (2006, 2007), and they rest on three ethics of commoning: the prefigurative desire to ‘live-in-common’ and solve our housing problems collectively in the here and now; the strategic need to defend and produce ‘anticapitalist commons’ (Kamola and Meyerhoff, 2009) that impose limits to capital and open up an outside to accumulation; and the hegemonic quest for an alternative world in which commons and commoning can be generalised at the expense of capitalism.
Introduction: a few definitions and explanations Autonomous self-organization Anarchist intervention Some Historical and Current Situations Italy 1970’s Spain 1976–1979 Comiso, Sicily 1982–3 Albania 1997 Bolivia 2000 — present Kabyle region, Algeria 2001 — present Argentina 2001 — ? Basilicata, Italy, November 2003 Wildcat strikes in Italy, Winter 2003–4 A few significant features The Situation in the US The absence of a social movement Two examples of the problem Conclusion
Τα κείμενα με το 
είναι σε διαδικασία μετάφρασης
